What is the Real Obstacle to Rural Broadband Deployment?

The “Real” obstacle to deployment oftalking about. The lines are already there. Every
high-speed internet access in rural areas is cost. Icommunity in this country has some type of
can say that because our company providesphone system that is connected to the greater
high-speed wireless internet access in seven smallnational grid. But Verizon has a strangle hold on
communities and their surrounding areas. Theusing that installed infrastructure. Even though
services offered in each community arethere are lots of small companies who might be
profitable, some more than others, but, still,willing to provide the services, it is unaffordable.
profitable. In any given community from oneVerizon has started to provide DSL service in a
quarter to one half of the revenues go to payingfew towns in this area. They picked the biggest
for the backend internet access from a Telco,towns first. Most small communities still have only
either Verizon or AT&T. In our area a single T1dial-up if they are lucky enough to have a
running at 1.54 mbs costs about $700 per month.provider with a local number for them to use.
There are ads online about T1’s for as low asThere are also costs for a Telco like Verizon to
$299 but you have to be in a large metro area. Iprovide DSL services in a community. But the
have been told in Springfield, Il., about 50 miles tocosts are one time equipment costs and not the
the east, one can obtain a T1 for about $350 perongoing expense of internet backhaul. For a
month. So why is ours so high priced. There iscompany like Verizon to provide DSL service
only one reason. Verizon is the only local phoneacross their entire service area the expense
company with no competition so they canwould be considerable. So it is understandable why
charges as much as the market will bear. Thereit is not happening. There are probably lots of
are numerous towns we could provide service insmall companies like ours that would like to be
where we might wind up with maybe 10able to provide high-speed internet access to
customers. If I cannot link wirelessly from one ofsmaller communities. If, years ago, the
our existing facilities to one of these towns thengovernment had actually wanted broadband in
we simply cannot provide service. So thoserural areas, they could have simply told the Telcos
people are out of luck. In the past severalto loosen up their hold on bandwidth and help
Presidential election cycles one of the clarion callsthose local companies step up to be the local
has been to provide high speed internet access ininternet provider. The equipment costs would be
rural communities. This pronouncement goes backspread across numerous small companies and a
at least 12 years. So what happened? Mostlot more people in rural areas would have the
campaign rhetoric is just that, a bunch of hot air. Ibenefit of broadband internet access.
recently attended the announcement of one ofMichael Dappert is co-founder of Winco, Inc., a
the current Democratic Presidential Candidatesdial-up and Wireless Internet Provider in West
and sure enough one of his ideas was “theCentral Illinois since 1996. Anyone can start their
laying of broadband lines in rural communities”.own discussion at If you are a musician you can
I do not think he even knows what he waspromote yourself for free at Musicgig.us.